Categories

Polls

Everyone picked Seattle in the survivor pool. Who would you pick instead?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Vikings choosing between Winfield and Favre?

It was reported earlier this week that the Minnesota Vikings had reached an impasse in talks on a contract extension for cornerback Antoine Winfield.

Not a huge issue, was my first thought. There’s plenty of time for both sides to meet in the middle and hammer something out – though the organization’s strategy in dealing with former center Matt Birk in a similar situation made me a bit squirmy.

But now Charley Walters at the St. Paul Pioneer Press is reporting that the Vikings may be struggling to decide between extending Winfield and signing Brett Favre.

Now, let’s breathe a minute first. Walters often gets some interesting tidbits but his column is also known for its speculative nature, especially regarding some of his efforts to establish players’ market values regarding salaries or trades.

Nonetheless, if the Vikings are having a hard time choosing between Winfield and Favre, I will attempt here to break it down for them. Winfield is a 31-year-old cornerback who is a tackling maven in run support coming off arguably his best season. Favre is a 39-year-old quarterback coming off a terrible five game slide to end the 2008 season – a season during which he played with an as of yet unfixed torn bicep muscle.

Can someone please, please explain why there is even a discussion here? If you can bring in Favre at a reasonable price (I would argue the $10 million mentioned in Walters’ column is perhaps too high) to run the offense for a year or two, I guess it’s a liveable deal if he is healthy. But if bringing in Favre in any way jeopardizes the team’s ability to keep Winfield, I’m sorry, it’s not a deal worth making.

Favre, if he’s not washed up already, is close. He’s perilously close to becoming one of “those guys” who hangs on too long at the end. Winfield, as evidenced by his play last season, still has a lot of good years left.

Be Sociable, Share!

2 Responses to Vikings choosing between Winfield and Favre?

  • Tony P says:

    Sounds like Favre to the Vikings is a done deal if Favre’s arm is fit enough. That’s a big if but that’s the bottom line now.

  • Charles says:

    I love Brette Farve as a competitor and a future hall of fame cannadaite but he should have hung it up 2 years ago. Twice in 2006 and 2007 he had the opportunity to leave as a winner and instead he goes out on a 5-game losing streak with a different team. To even consider taking him as a quarterback would be completely foolish. Some of the worst quarterbacks have taken their teams to the Super Bowl instead of Farve. One of them is Rex Grossman. Rex, despite throwing 20 interception got his mediocre and very overrated team to the Super Bowl when they lost to the Colts. Eli Manning, despite suffering from erratic play and lacking experience, took a mediocre team to the playoffs and beat one of the best teams in NFL history in the patriots. Ben Rothlesburger won the Lombardi Trophi twice despite of a subpar offense in both 05 and 08 while Farve only has one trophy. Brett needs to do the game a favor and hang it up. His legacy is in tact because of his body of work. He has a ring, and he is on his way to Canton. There is no reason for him to come back. He needs to stay retired!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Zoneblitz on TwitterZoneblitz on Facebook

Add to Technorati Favorites
>